S&P 5007,753.11▼0.1% Nasdaq26,605.36▼0.3% Dow53,975.98▼0.1% Russell 2K3,017.40▼0.6% 10-Yr4.70%+4bp VIX15.46+0.56 WTI$82.30▲5.3% Gold$4,448.60▲2.5% EUR/USD1.155▲0.2% BTC$63,478▼0.7% Nikkei65,607▼0.1%
At close · Mon, Aug 10, 2026
Daily Market Updates.

Crypto

HomeCryptoMarket StructureBakkt profit hinges on non-cash Transchem warrant reva…

Bakkt profit hinges on non-cash Transchem warrant revaluation

Bakkt reported $80.8 million net income in Q2 2026, but an illustrative pre-tax loss of about $18.8 million emerges after excluding the Transchem and legacy warrant fair-value gains.

Bakkt reported Q2 2026 net income of $80.8 million, reversing a $14.7 million loss a year earlier, but CryptoSlate reports that the swing largely came from non-cash fair-value accounting tied to Transchem warrants rather than an improvement in day-to-day crypto-services operations.

In Bakkt’s results dated Aug. 10, its largest driver was a $98.5 million non-cash gain from revaluing Transchem warrants, with an additional $1.4 million non-cash gain from a legacy warrant liability. Removing those marks from Bakkt’s $81.1 million pre-tax result, and before considering an equity-method loss, yields an illustrative pre-tax loss of about $18.8 million, highlighting how heavily the headline outcome depended on the company’s fair-value treatment.

CryptoSlate also noted that operating performance moved the other way. Revenue fell 70% to $170.1 million from $568.1 million, which Bakkt attributed to client transitions and softer digital-asset trading volumes, while crypto costs and execution, clearing, and brokerage fees totaled $169.3 million, leaving roughly a $0.9 million residual before other operating expenses.

The outlet further reported that Bakkt’s operating loss from continuing operations widened to $19.6 million from $16.1 million, and adjusted EBITDA showed an $11.8 million loss versus a $9.8 million loss a year earlier. Bakkt ended June with $50.7 million of cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash, and it said it had no long-term debt, while cautioning that its Strategic Asset Value does not represent market or liquidation value.

More like this

Sources

Get the close, explained.

One email every trading day: what moved, why it moved, and what's on deck tomorrow. Read in 3 minutes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.